State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1925
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 1986
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harbin v. State · Sizemore v. Commonwealth · Brazeale v. State · State v. Munson · State v. Cox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`Except as hereinafter provided in this amendatory act, it shall be unlawful for any person to receive, import, possess, transport, deliver, manufacture, sell, give away or barter any intoxicating liquor within this state. * * *.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“means to have the actual control, care, and management of the liquor, and not a passing control, fleeting and shadowy in its nature.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“for any * * * person or individual * * * to have, control, or possess, in this state, any of said enumerated liquors or beverages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.