Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

117 Pa. Super. 291

178 A 173

Rood v. Rood

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1935

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1935-03-06

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1935-03-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1959

7 state decisions

30193519401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pee Curiam,

¶1 This was an action of divorce brought by a husband against his wife, on the ground of wilful and malicious desertion.

¶2 The court below refused to enter a decree of divorce, and dismissed the libel, for the reason that the evidence did not clearly establish a wilful and malicious desertion, without reasonable cause, on the part of the wife, respondent. The reasons for its action are convincingly stated in the opinion by Judge Valentine. We have read the evidence carefully and agree with the findings and conclusions of the learned judge of the court below. On his opinion, the decree is affirmed at the costs of the appellant.

/117/pasuper/291 · .json · Public domain