Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 SO2D 408 - Mott v. Cochran

Mott v. Cochran’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2016

5 state decisions

20196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 62 So. 2d 5 - Henderson v. Antonacci · Townsend v. Beck · Ellis v. State · 113 So. 2d 383 - State Ex Rel. Shargaa v. Culver · Reynolds v. Alger-Sullivan Lumber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is not a part of the judicial responsibility to undertake to invalidate them (statutes) unless the parties to the cause raise the question and assault the statute because of organic weaknesses.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.