Wells v. Castro’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 542 So. 2d 1327 - Schnurmacher Holding, Inc. v. Noriega · 3 So. 3d 1194 - Trytek v. Gale Industries, Inc. · 674 So. 2d 789 - Town of Manalapan v. Rechler · 783 So. 2d 231 - Moser v. Barron Chase Securities, Inc. · First Baptist Church of Cape Coral, Florida, Inc. v. Compass Construction, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The AWARD previously in this case tracks current Florida case law on this question so that will not be revisited here. Weighing that case law, as well as that cited for the first time in this case in the briefs of the parties, I find that neither Mr. Castro nor the Wells is a prevailing party for the purpose of an award of attorneys’ fees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“upon application of a party to the arbitration, unless an insurer moves to vacate, modify or clarify an award pursuant to § 682.13. Fla. Stat. § 682.12 . Furthermore, under Florida's Arbitration Code,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]n the absence of a motion legally sufficient under either §§ 682.13 or 682.14, the trial court must confirm the award.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.