Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 SW3D 239 - State v. Saylor

State v. Saylor’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
4
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Malloy v. Hogan · Old Chief v. United States · Davis v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The accused “must articulate his desire to have counsel present sufficiently clearly that a reasonable [police] officer ... would understand the statement to be a request for an attorney.” If the suspect fails to make such an unambiguous statement, police may continue to question him without clarifying any equivocal requests for counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused ... shall not be compelled to give evidence against himself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'Normally, a mistrial should be declared only if there is a manifest necessity for such action.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.