Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 SW3D 798 - Hollen v. State

Hollen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Old Chief v. United States · Jackson v. State · Tamez v. State · Barfield v. State · Robles v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The appellant's stipulation would have placed the prior convictions into evidence, making the jury aware of their existence. This would have satisfied the evidentiary requirements regarding stipulations while avoiding the unfair prejudice that would accompany further mention of the convictions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the jury may be informed of the stipulation and any written stipulation may be offered into evidence before the jury.” Maj. Op. at 640. The majority also notes that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The stipulation would have diminished the probative value of the [judgments], however, because the same information would have been admitted in an alternate form.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.