Rose v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1944
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Since the repeal of Article 7,696, Revised Civil Statutes of 1920 are persons whose land has been legally sold to individuals under tax judgments rendered for collection of state and county taxes empowered to redeem said land by paying to such individual purchaser double the amount paid by the purchaser at the tax sale for the land ?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rose v. Turner“`That all civil statutes of a general nature in force, when the revised statutes take effect, and which are not included herein, or *Page 435 which are not hereby expressly continued in force, are hereby repealed.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rose v. Turner“`That all laws * * * fixing a time limit in which to redeem lands sold for taxes * * * are continued in force.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rose v. Turner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.