Jefferson v. Driver’s Empirical Analysis
117 U.S. 272 · 1886
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2003 · most notably Cochran v. Montgomery County (1905), Rosenthal v. Coates (1893)
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cable v. Ellis · Bible Society v. Grove · Myers v. Swann · Edrington v. Jefferson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““As to the application of J. VV. Jefferson for a removal under the act of 1875, the rule in Cable v. Ellis, 110 U. S. 380 , 4 Sup. Ct. 85 , applies. lie was brought into the suit as a purchaser pendente lite, and the, relief asked against him is only an incident to the original controversy. The proceeding is merely ancillary to the suit pending when he bought the property in dispute, and under which he got possession. It is, in short, only a part of the machinery in the administration of the cause. By purchasing pendente lite he connected himself with the suit, subject to the disabilities of the other parties in respect to a removal at the time lie came in.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[b]y purchasing pendente lite he connected himself with the suit, subject to the disabilities of the other parties in respect to a removal at the time he came in.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“When a suit is between a citizen of the State in which it is brought and a citizen of another State, it may be so removed on the petition of the latter,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.