Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 U.S. 327 - Glasgow v. Lipse

Glasgow v. Lipse’s Empirical Analysis

117 U.S. 327 · 1886

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 2002
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2002

2 state decisions

401886189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Horn v. Lockhart · Lamar v. Micou · Ward v. Smith · McBurney v. Carson · Fretz v. Stover

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The present case does not come under the doctrine. It falls within the class where, for debts payable in lawful money, the depreciated currency of the country where they were contracted and the executor resides can be used at its. face value in payment of legacies, and, therefore, may be accepted by him without -a breach of trust. The notes, received had in October, 1862, to a great extent, superseded the use of coin, and became the principal currency of the Confederate States. All business transactions there were had with reference to them. They were a standard of value, according to which contracts were made and discharged. Having, therefore, an exchangeable value, they were sought for by residents within the Confederacy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.