Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 U.S. 348 - Mackin v. United States

Mackin v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

117 U.S. 348 · 1886

Citation profile

382
cited by 382 later decisions
51
cited 51 times by the Supreme Court
24
states following
September 2022
most recently cited

144 federal appellate · 51 district · 82 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 382 later decisions (51 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2022 · most notably Bell v. Wolfish (1979), Branzburg v. Hayes (1972)

144 federal appellate · 51 district · 82 state decisions — followed in 24 states

530188618901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hurtado v. People of the State of California · Wilson · Kurtz v. Moffitt · United States v. Waddell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 382 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(n)o person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, . . .”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The leading word “capital” describing the crime by its punishment only, the associated words “or otherwise infamous crime” must, by an elementary rule of construction, be held to include any crime subject to an infamous punishment, even if they should be held to include also crimes infamous in their nature, independently of the punishment affixed to them. Having regard to the object and the terms of the Amendment, as well as to the history of its proposal and adoption, and to the early understanding and practice under it, no person can be held to answer, without presentment or indictment by a grand jury, for any crime for which an infamous punishment may lawfully be imposed by the court. The test is whether the crime is one for which the statutes authorize the court to award an infamous punishment, not whether the punishment ultimately awarded is an infamous one; when the accused is in danger of being subjected to an infamous punishment if convicted, he has the right to insist that he shall not be put upon his trial, except on the accusation of a grand jury.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““We cannot doubt that at the present day imprisonment in a state prison or penitentiary, with or without hard labor, is an infamous punishment.””
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.