Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 U.S. 415 - Marshall v. Hubbard

Marshall v. Hubbard’s Empirical Analysis

117 U.S. 415 · 1886

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
June 1992
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 4 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1992 · most notably Sparf v. United States (1895), Rosen v. United States (1896)

41 federal appellate · 4 district · 9 state decisions

240188618901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Randall v. Baltimore O R · Pleasants v. Fant · Board of County Com'rs of the County of Anderson v. Beal · Baylis v. Travelers' Ins Co of Hartford Conn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““I think, therefore, that upon the proofs the case is within the rule laid down by the Supreme Court of the United States, namely: The court can now see, upon the evidence that bears upon the question of materiality of the representations, and alleged injury to the defendant, that if the jury were to render a verdict against the plaintiff it would have to set that verdict aside.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Not only must the representations be made, not only must they be fraudulent, and not only must it appear that the party relied, and had a right to-rely, upon them, but it must also be shown that the representations were material to the contract or transaction which took place between the parties.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.