Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 U.S. 591 - Mutual Life Ins Co of New York v. Armstrong

Mutual Life Ins Co of New York v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

190
cited by 190 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
40
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 5 district · 144 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 190 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2024 · most notably Giles v. California (2008), Riggs v. . Palmer (1889)

11 federal appellate · 5 district · 144 state decisions — followed in 40 states

270188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Warnock v. Davis · Lincoln v. Claflin · Butler v. Watkins · Carroll v. Alston · New York Life Insurance v. Flack

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 190 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It would be a reproach to the jurisprudence of the country if one could recover insurance money payable on the death of the party whose life he had feloniously taken.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The term ‘legal representatives’ is not necessarily restricted to the personal representatives of one deceased, but is sufficiently broad to cover all persons who, with respect to his property, stand in his place and represent his interests, whether transferred to them by his act or by operation of law.” New York Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Armstrong, 117 U. S. 591 (6 Sup. Ct. 877).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““A repetition of acts of the same character naturally indicates the same purpose in' all of them; and if when considered together they cannot be reasonably explained without ascribing a particular motive to -the perpetrator, such motive will be considered as prompting each act;””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.