117 Wash. 2d 156 - State v. Allert’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably 129 Wash. 2d 635 - State v. Branch (1996), 124 Wash. 2d 57 - State v. Johnson (1994)
66 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway · 106 Wash. 2d 514 - State v. Nordby · 108 Wash. 2d 82 - In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Deming · 109 Wash. 2d 947 - Allingham v. City of Seattle · 108 Wash. 2d 125 - State v. Pascal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. 2. Do the reasons justify a departure from the standard range? The standard of review on this is as a”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“The SRA was designed to provide proportionate punishment, protect the public and provide rehabilitation, and the presumptive ranges established for each crime represent the Legislature's judgment as to how best to accommodate those interests. State v. Pascal, 108 Wash.2d 125, 137 , 736 P.2d 1065 (1987) held that the trial court's subjective determination that these ranges are unwise or that they do not advance these goals is not a reason justifying departure from the normal range....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If the legislature intends that intoxication by an alcoholic be treated differently for sentencing purposes than intoxication by one not an alcoholic, then that decision is better suited to the legislative process....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.