Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 Wash. 2d 242 - Douglas v. Freeman

117 Wash. 2d 242 - Douglas v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

112
cited by 112 later decisions
1
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 105 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 112 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably State v. Hendrickson (1996), 124 Wash. 2d 158 - Havens v. C & D PLASTICS, INC. (1994)

3 federal appellate · 105 state decisions

5101991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc. · 100 Wash. 2d 421 - Petersen v. State · 109 Wash. 2d 235 - Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc. · 101 Wash. 2d 226 - Pedroza v. Bryant · 41 Wash. App. 495 - Byerly v. Madsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 112 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[t]he number and specific language of the instructions are matters left to the trial court's discretion.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is a well-established maxim that this court will generally not address arguments raised for the first time in a supplemental brief and not made originally by the petitioner or respondent within the petition for review or the response to the petition.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “no competent evidence or reasonable inference that would sustain a verdict for the nonmoving party.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.