Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 WASHAPP 142 - State v. Rehn

State v. Rehn’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Delaware v. Prouse · California v. Beheler · Thompson v. Keohane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There's—there was a conversation, and I don't recall if he voluntarily said that he would go up and get—or made the—made the offer. And, I asked him to go ahead and go up and get them. But it was a—it was—it was a request that he go up and get them. It wasn't an order. I didn't order him to go up there and retrieve the mushrooms.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “State v. Mendez, 137 Wash.2d 208, 222 , 970 P.2d 722 (1999). Apparently, barring exceptional circumstances, a passenger is free to walk away from or stay at the traffic stop scene. In one exceptional circumstance, the Supreme Court noted the defendant passenger”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “CP at 93. The deputy could not recall taking Mr. Rehn's driver's license or giving it back to him later. And the deputy could not recall whether he ran a warrant check on Mr. Rehn. The deputy said it was not his practice to ask persons to empty their pockets,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.