State v. Oliva’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 120 Wash. 2d 573 - Scott Galvanizing, Inc. v. Northwest EnviroServices, Inc. · State v. Sledge · 125 Wash. 2d 688 - State v. Young · 85 Wash. 2d 45 - State v. Cosner · 95 Wash. 2d 799 - State v. Wheeler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“THE COURT: All right. Well Mr. Schiffner [defense counsel] has argued on behalf of his client here today that the court should order a SSOSA evaluation and the county should pay the funds. This court, in reading the PSI before today's hearing, finds that there's no basis other than the charged crime for the court to find that a SSOSA evaluation would be helpful. And if that was the case, if it was just sufficient to say the charged crime is sufficient, every one of these cases with this, with a sexual offense, every one would be evaluated for a SSOSA evaluation. I'm going to deny the request to order the SSOSA evaluation, given the information that I have in the PSI.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Oliva“THE COURT: I'll be honest with everyone, that's where I'm leaning. When I read the PSI I see a lot of crimes that aren'twith a lot of victims and they're not all necessarily sex related. We don't have someonein fact I think he was evaluated with an MMPI [1] with the antisocial personality disorder and you don't have sexual deviancy of any kind. I don't see this case spinning into that at all, any threshold being met in that way. Is that your position Mr. Owens [the prosecutor]? MR. OWENS: It is.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Oliva“I don't think [the prosecutor] is violating our agreement. I think he's properly arguing what I'd argue if I was in his shoes. The PSI, without a SSOSA evaluation, thought my client was a very poor candidate. Whether a SSOSA evaluation will change their mind, I don't know.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Oliva
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.