Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 117 Wis. 2d 9 - State v. Daniels

117 Wis. 2d 9 - State v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably State v. Gallion (2004), 191 Wis. 2d 769 - Barakat v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Social Services (1995)

56 state decisions

2401983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · 70 Wis. 2d 179 - Ocanas v. State · 54 Wis. 2d 361 - State v. Tew · 30 Wis. 2d 101 - Collier v. State · 92 Wis. 2d 372 - Thomas v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A sentence well within the limits of the maximum sentence is not so disproportionate to the offense committed as to shock the public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable people concerning what is right and proper under the circumstances.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An appellate court will only substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact [regarding credibility determinations when the evidence is] inherently or patently incredible-that kind of evidence which conflicts with nature or with fully established or conceded facts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “is to remove from judicial determination the question of competency and to submit the testimony to the jury so that it may assess its weight and credibility”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.