Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

118 A.D.2d 561

Sussman v. Hendrickson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1986-03-03

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2005

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-03-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to determine a claim to real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wager, J.), entered June 1, 1984, which, inter alia, granted the defendants’ motion to vacate a default judgment entered May 17, 1983. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court, dated July 12, 1984, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination (CPLR 5517 [b]).

¶2Appeal from the order entered June 1, 1984 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. That order was superseded by the order dated July 12,1984, made upon reargument.

¶3Order dated July 12, 1984 affirmed, insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

¶4Under all of the circumstances of this case we do not find that there was an improvident exercise of discretion by Special Term in vacating the defendants’ default. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur. [123 Misc 2d 949.]

/118/ad2d/561 · .json · Public domain