In Re Boykin’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc. · Samore v. Graham · Swanson Humphrey III v. J Buckley · In Re Flygstad · Electrical Workers, Local No. 1 Credit Union v. IBEW-NECA Holiday Trust Fund
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Debtor’s present and anticipated living expenses; (2) Debtor's present and anticipated income from all sources; (3) Age of debtor and dependents; (4) Health of the debtor and dependents; (5) Debtor’s ability to work and earn a living; (6) Debtor’s job skills, training, and education; (7) Debtor’s other assets, including exempt assets; (8) Liquidity of other assets; (9) Debtor’s ability to save for retirement; (10) Special needs of the debtor and dependents; (11) Debtor’s financial obligations, e.g. alimony or support payments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Hentzen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.