Otte v. Pierce’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2007
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Potter v. Swinehart · Baker v. Couch · Isaak v. Perry · Popham v. Duncan · Rising v. Hoffman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the contract or transaction in question is illegal, fraudulent, or immoral, and there is mutual misconduct of the parties with respect thereto, neither law nor equity will aid either to enforce, revoke, or rescind. To such disputes the courts will not listen, and the parties thereto they will leave in the exact position in which they have placed themselves.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Watson v. Watson“aid a man who founds his cause of action on his own immoral or illegal act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Watson v. Watson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.