State v. Faro’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
2 district · 51 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently April 2008 · most notably State v. Roque (1983), State v. Skakel (2006)
2 district · 51 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Lacher · United States v. Corbett · State v. Levy · State v. Parker · Hazzard v. Gallucci
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The title of an Act cannot enlarge or confer power, but in the construction of Statutes which are doubtful or ambiguous in meaning the title may aid in showing the legislative intent."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pasqualoni
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.