Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

118 F. 1019

Docket No. 853.

Piper v. Cashell

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided January 1, 1902

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1902

2 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1902

¶1In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Second Division of the District of Alaska.

¶2H. E. Shields and C. S. Hannum, for plaintiff in error.

¶3Samuel Knight, for defendants in error.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5In the above-entitled cause, counsel for the defendants in error having called the attention of the court to the fact that counsel who-signed the brief for the plaintiff in error therein are not members of the bar of the circuit court of appeals, thereupon the court held that briefs which were not signed by counsel whose qualifications were consistent with the requirements of rule 7 of the court (31 C. C. A. cxliv, 90 Fed. cxliv) would not be considered by the court

/118/f1d/1019 · .json · Public domain