118 F.1d 272 - Barber v. Coit — 118 F. 272

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1931

6 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶11. Appeal—Reversal—Incompleteness of Record.

¶2Where the record fails to show facts which are essential to enable the appellate court to safely decide the cause, it will reverse the decree on its own motion, and remand the case for a rehearing.

¶3Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.

¶4I. T. Siddall, for appellant.

¶5W. M. Duncan, for appellee.

¶6Before BURTON, DAY, and SEVERENS, Circuit Judges.

¶7PER CURIAM.

¶8In this case the court, upon consideration, is of opinion that in order to give due effect to the decree of the circuit court for Portage county, Ohio, in the suit of the First National Bank of Garrettsburg and A. A. Barber, trustee, against Leroy H. Payne et al., the pleadings in that case should be filed, that the decree may be examined in connection therewith. It is therefore ordered that the decree of the district court of the United States be reversed, and the cause remanded to said court, with directions that the cause be remitted to the referee by said court, with directions that he take proof of the pleadings in said Ohio case, and that, upon the record as thus completed, the referee proceed to rehear the matter. This order is made because the case is not properly prepared for decision, and because great injustice may be done ii the cause is to be decided on the present record. The order is made upon our own motion, on authority of Estho v. Lear, 7 Pet. 130, 131, 8 L. Ed. 632, and Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Illinois, 146 U. S. 387, 13 Sup. Ct. 110, 36 L. Ed. 1018. The costs of this appeal will be divided.