Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

118 F.2d 1013

Docket No. 8482.

Bocz v. Fry

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1941.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1941-03-10

2 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1941-03-10

¶1Alexander J. Bocz, of Detroit, Mich., in pro per.

¶2Shields, Ballard, Jennings & Taber, of Lansing, Mich., for appellee.

¶3Before HICKS, SIMONS, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, appellant appearing in his own behalf, and it appearing to the court that due to the chaotic and insufficient condition of the record and to the confused, indefinite, and incoherent contents of appellant’s brief, no basis for assignments or averments of error is disclosed.

¶6It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the decree appealed from be, and the same is in all things, affirmed.

/118/f2d/1013 · .json · Public domain