Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

118 F.2d 1014

Docket No. 9771.

United States v. Schaefer

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1941.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1941-04-02

8 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1941-04-02

¶1Wm. Fleet Palmer, U. S. Atty., and Irl D. Brett, Sp. Atty., Lands Division, Department of Justice, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

¶2Walter I. Lyon, of Los Angeles, Cal., fori appellees Tanner and others.

¶3Ray H. Fitzgerrell and Lyle W. Rucker, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee McKinney and others.

¶4Robert W. Daniels, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Paugh.

¶5Roy Raymond Colby, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Reimiller.

¶6O’Melveny, Tuller & Myers, and John R. A. Girling, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Baker.

¶7Will H. Winston, of Long Beach, Cal., for appellee Edgar.

¶8John L. Schaefer, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Schaefer.

¶9Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

¶10PER CURIAM.

¶11On stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeal herein as to parcels 3, 16, 18, 26, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 39-A dismissed; and on stipulation judgment of District Court amended as to parcels 3, 32 and 33; that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, *and mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.

/118/f2d/1014 · .json · Public domain