Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 F.2d 13 - Keiser v. Walsh

Keiser v. Walsh’s Empirical Analysis

118 F.2d 13 · 1941

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
5
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 6 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently June 2008 · most notably Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. (1959), Maryland Metals, Inc. v. Metzner (1978)

33 federal appellate · 6 district · 8 state decisions

2401941195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Meinhard v. Salmon · Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co. · Trice v. Comstock · Pratt v. Shell Petroleum Corp. · Lindsay v. Swift

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““motion to dismiss was granted below, but the circuit court of appeals reversed the ruling, saying: ‘We need not consider whether appellant has asked for the proper relief. By Rule 54(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “* * * every final judgment shall grant the relief to which the party in whose favor it is rendered is entitled, even if the party has not demanded such relief in his pleadings.” Accordingly a complaint is sufficient if it sets forth facts which show that the plaintiff is entitled to any relief which the court can grant.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An agent need not wait until he is on the street before he looks for other work. He may plan and prepare, during the agency, to engage in a competing business after it ceases,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.