¶1John J. Pringle, Jr. (Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for petitioner.
¶2Harry J. Alker, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa. (Edwin Hall, 2nd, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondents.
¶3Before BIGGS, JONES, and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.
¶5The sole question presented by the appeals at bar is ruled by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Guggenheim v. Rasquin, 61 S.Ct. 507, 85 L.Ed. -, in favor of the contention of the petitioner.
¶6Accordingly, the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals are reversed and the causes are remanded for determination of taxes in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court which we have cited.