Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 F.2d 557 - Johnson v. Wilson

Johnson v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

118 F.2d 557 · 1941

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 1997
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1997

10 federal appellate ·

70194119501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank · Swift & Co. v. United States · Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co. · Des Moines Navigation Co v. Iowa Homestead Co · In Re Field's Estate

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reservation to make further orders does not mean orders inconsistent with the finality of the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “not inconsistent with the finality of the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.