In re Rosenblatt’s Empirical Analysis
118 F.2d 590 · 1941
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2009
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Schneider · In re Wheeler · In re Thomas · In re Ball
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In the case of In re Laura Schneider, 39 F.2d 278 , 279, 17 C.C.P.A., Patents, 952, which came before us during the first year of our patent jurisdiction, we had occasion to say: “ ‘Those appealing to this court should give to the court, by specific assignments and with particularity, all grounds of alleged error upon which they rely.’ ” “The reason for and the philosophy of the rule, even aside from the statutory provisions, are so clear that no extensive discussion of those matters need be indulged. This court does not wish to seem super-technical, but it is entitled to have from those appealing a clear and specific statement of the exact points relied upon, and upon this we must insist. * * * ” (Emphasis supplied.)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In re Gruschwitz · In re Wesselman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.