Ferris v. Cuevas’s Empirical Analysis
118 F.3d 122 · 1997
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably Hoblock v. Albany County Board of Elections (2005), Gospel Missions of America v. City of Los Angeles (2003)
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738
Relies on Allen v. McCurry · Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc. · Ryan v. New York Telephone Co. · O'Brien v. City of Syracuse · Smith v. Russell Sage College
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we are required to make an independent examination of the record as a whole without deference to the factual findings of the trial court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““once a claim is brought to a final conclusion, all other claims arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions are barred, even if based upon different theories or if seeking a different remedy.” ... “[U]nder the ‘transactional analysis’ approach adopted by the [New York State] Court of Appeals, the doctrine of res judicata also operates to preclude the litigation of matters that could have or should have been raised in a prior proceeding arising from the same ‘factual grouping,’ ‘transaction,’ or ‘series of transactions.’ ”... Following a valid final judgment, therefore, res judicata bars future litigation between the same parties, or those in privity with them, on the same cause of action.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Fischer“involvement in and control of every aspect of both the state and federal actions presents a connection of much greater magnitude than identity of interest alone.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.