Masayesva v. Hale’s Empirical Analysis
118 F.3d 1371 · 1997
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (2001), White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United States (2001)
19 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 640D (Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation Amendments) · 25 U.S.C. § 640D · 25 U.S.C. § 640D
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Baker v. Carr · United States v. Mitchell · Oklahoma v. New Mexico · Greening v. Moran
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he trustee is under a duty to the beneficiary to use reasonable care and skill to preserve the trust property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“The doctrine of judicial estoppel bars a party from taking inconsistent positions in the same litigation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kest v. Kest
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.