McBride v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
118 F.3d 432 · 1997
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Magouirk v. Phillips (1998), Muniz v. Johnson (1998)
8 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Lindh v. Murphy · Barefoot v. Estelle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“brings up all issues raised in a petitioner's federal habeas petition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) written notice of the claimed violations of parole; (b) disclosure to the parolee of evidence against him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence; (d) the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation); (e) a ‘neutral and detached’ hearing body such as a traditional parole board, members of which need not be judicial officers or lawyers; and (f) a written statement by the factfinders as to the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking parole.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“his right to confront the adverse witness whose information provided the basis for parole revocation in a situation where his interest in exercising that right was paramount”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Williams v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.