Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 F.3d 466 - United States v. Rogers

United States v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

118 F.3d 466 · 1997

Citation profile

128
cited by 128 later decisions
7
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 128 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably State v. Adams (Slip Opinion) (2015), United States v. Barnett (2005)

50 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions

6401997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Olano · Arizona v. Fulminante · Johnson v. United States · United States v. Marion · United States v. Lopez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 128 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]ven if [defendant] had established actual substantial prejudice, he failed to satisfy the second part of the test for unconstitutional pre-indictment delay: 'that the delay was an intentional device by the government to gain a tactical advantage.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Even when the government cites its own court filings rather than offering sworn testimony on the investigative reasons for the delay, we may accept the government's representations about the reason for delay.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'is nearly insurmountable, especially because proof of actual prejudice is always speculative.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.