Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

118 F.3d 667

Docket Nos. 92-17087, 93-15061 and 93-15719.

Yniguez

Full caption · 3 consolidated cases

  • Maria-Kelley F. YNIGUEZ; Jaime P. Gutierrez, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Arizonans Against Constitutional Tampering, Intervenors-Plaintiffs- Appellees, and State of Arizona; Rose Mofford; Robert Corbin, et alv.ARIZONANS FOR OFFICIAL ENGLISH; Robert D. Parks, Intervenors-Defendants- Appellants. Maria-Kelley F
  • YNIGUEZv.STATE OF ARIZONA; Rose Mofford; Robert Corbin, et al., Defendants-Appellees, and Arizonans for Official English; Robert D. Parks, Intervenors-Defendants- Appellants. Maria-Kelley F
  • YNIGUEZv.STATE OF ARIZONA; Rose Mofford; Robert Corbin, et al

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 1, 1997.

Relies on Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona · Yniguez

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2018

2 district · 2 state decisions

110199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

Before HUG, Chief Judge, and WALLACE, PREGERSON, REINHARDT, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, FERNANDEZ, KLEINFELD and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

¶1

The judgment of the en banc court, 69 F.3d 920 (9th Cir. 1995), is vacated and the case is remanded to the original three-judge panel with instructions to remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 1055, 137 L.Ed.2d 170 (1997).

/118/f3d/667 · .json · Public domain