Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 F.3d 76 - Matimak Trading Co. v. Khalily

Matimak Trading Co. v. Khalily’s Empirical Analysis

118 F.3d 76 · 1997

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
October 2015
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2015 · most notably Southern Cross Overseas Agencies Inc New Jersey Corporation v. Wah Kwong Shipping Group Ltd a Foreign Corporation (1999), JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Traffic Stream (BVI) Infrastructure Ltd. (2002)

23 federal appellate · 1 district ·

320199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. Davenport · Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Sabbatino · Mohasco Corp. v. Silver · Guaranty Trust Co of New York v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “citizen[] or subject[] of a foreign state”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “unexplained change in stance . . . might under different circumstances require further inquiry of its ulterior motives,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Alexis Holyweek Sarei Paul E. Nerau Thomas Tamausi Phillip Miriori Gregory Kopa Methodius Nesiko Aloysius Moses Rapheal Niniku Gabriel Tareasi Linus Takinu Leo Wuis Michael Akope Benedict Pisi Thomas Kobuko John Tamuasi Norman Mouvo John Osani Ben Korus Namira Kawona Joanne Bosco John Pigolo Magdalene Pigolo, Individually and on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Rio Tinto, Plc Rio Tinted Limited, Alexis Holyweek Sarei Paul E. Nerau Thomas Tamausi Phillip Miriori Gregory Kopa Methodius Nesiko Aloysius Moses Rapheal Niniku Gabriel Tareasi Linus Takinu Leo Wuis Michael Akope Benedict Pisi Thomas Kobuko John Tamuasi Norman Mouvo John Osani Ben Korus Namira Kawona Joanne Bosco John Pigolo Magdalene Pigolo, Individually and on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Rio Tinto, Plc Rio Tinted Limited · Alexis Holyweek Sarei Paul E. Nerau Thomas Tamausi Phillip Miriori Gregory Kopa Methodius Nesiko Aloysius Moses Rapheal Niniku Gabriel Tareasi Linus Takinu, Leo Wuis Michael Akope Benedict Pisi Thomas Kobuko John Tamuasi Norman Mouvo John Osani Ben Korus Namira Kawona Joanne Bosco John Pigolo Magdalene Pigolo, Individually and on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Rio Tinto, Plc Rio Tinto Limited, Alexis Holyweek Sarei Paul E. Nerau Thomas Tamausi Phillip Miriori Gregory Kopa Methodius Nesiko Aloysius Moses Rapheal Niniku Gabriel Tareasi Linus Takinu, Leo Wuis Michael Akope Benedict Pisi Thomas Kobuko John Tamuasi Norman Mouvo John Osani Ben Korus Namira Kawona Joanne Bosco John Pigolo Magdalene Pigolo, Individually and on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Rio Tinto, Plc Rio Tinto Limited

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.