Segrain v. Duffy’s Empirical Analysis
2024
Citation profile
1 district ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Rhode Island District Court)
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Hope v. Pelzer · Wilson v. Seiter · Whitley v. Albers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Clearly established means that, at the time of the [official's] conduct, the law was sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would understand that what they are doing is unlawful.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]o determine whether qualified immunity applies in a given case, we must determine: (1) whether a public official has violated a plaintiff's constitutionally protected right; and (2) whether the particular right that the official has violated was clearly established at the time of the violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Heredia v. Roscoe“[I]t is not enough merely to mention a possible argument in the most skeletal way, leaving the court to do counsel's work, create the ossature for the argument, and put flesh on its bones.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.