Allen v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
April 2017
most recently cited
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 48 U.S.C. § 1613A
Relies on Prosser v. Prosser · Feddersen v. Feddersen · Charles v. Charles · Ethyle Bloch v. Harold N. Bloch · Fuentes v. Fuentes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... the duration of the marriage, prior marriage of either party, antenuptial agreement of the parties, the age, health, station, occupation, amount and sources of income, vocational skills, em-ployability, estate, liabilities, and needs of each of the parties, custodial provisions, whether the apportionment is in lieu of or in addition to maintenance, and the opportunity of each for future acquisition of capital assets and income. The court shall also consider the contribution or dissipation of each party in the acquisition, preservation, depreciation, or appreciation in value , of the ... estate[], and the contribution of a spouse as a homemaker or to the family unit.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.