Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 Ill. 2d 244 - People v. Hooper

118 Ill. 2d 244 - People v. Hooper’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably 125 Ill. 2d 50 - People v. Evans (1988), 129 Ill. 2d 123 - People v. Harris (1989)

3 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

1801987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Batson v. Kentucky · Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · Swain v. State of Alabama · Griffith v. Kentucky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““I believe it would be manifestly unfair to a defendant if this court were to make a determination from a record made under Swain law whether or not a prima facie case has been established under Batson. *** If the defendant can present evidence of the discriminatory use of peremptory challenges under Batson law which was not disclosed by the record made under Swain guidelines, he should have an opportunity to present such evidence for the trial court’s consideration. *** [I]t may well be that on remand the trial court will have to decide the prima facie question from a cold record, as this court could do now. But that will not necessarily be true in all cases. We should not preclude the defendant from making such an additional showing by deciding now in this court whether or not a prima facie case of discriminatory use of peremptory challenges has been made.” Hooper, 118 Ill. 2d at 245-46 (Ryan, J., specially concurring).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “all cases on review in which the Batson issue is viable”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.