118 Ind. App. 68 - Foudy, Admr. v. Daugherty’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1979
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lindley v. Sink · Wilson, Admx. v. Rollings · Board of Co. Comm. St Joseph County v. Nevins · Claypool v. Jaqua · 115 Ind. App. 253 - Daugherty v. Daugherty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In actions for conversion, it is necessary for the plaintiff to show that before or at the time of the conversion, he had title, either general or special, to the property in controversy, coupled with the right of immediate possession, and that the property had been wrongfully converted by the defendant to his own use. In actions for conversion, the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title and not upon the weakness of his adversary. (Citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.