Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 LA 587 - Interstate Land Co. v. Doyle

Interstate Land Co. v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably Adsit v. Park (1919), Federico v. Nunez (1931)

26 state decisions

80190619101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hoyle v. Southern Athletic Club · 52 La. Ann. 276 - Succession of Trouilly · Succession of Williams v. Chaplain · Geddes v. Cunningham · Adolph v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As has already been said by this court, however, ‘an assessment may be “good and valid” in the name of the dead man, and yet the sale be illegal, if the proceedings to sell are not carried on contradictorily with parties in interest.’ Succession of Chaplain, 112 La. 1078 , 36 South. 859 . The Constitution (article 233) and the statutes (Acts No. 85, p. 129, of 1888, and No. 370 [No. 170] p. 170, of 1898, §§ 50, 51) require that notice of the proposed sale shall be served on the ‘delinquent’ (according to the Constitution) ‘taxpayer’ (according to the statutes), and, as a person who has departed this life cannot be considered within those classifications, and could not, in any case, be served with the notice, it has been held, when the apparent, or registered, owner is dead at the date of its issuance, that such notice shall be served on the actual owner, as (in that case) the ‘delinquent taxpayer,’ contemplated by the Constitution and the statutes.” (Writer’s italics.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.