Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 MASS 502 - Bemis v. Leonard

Bemis v. Leonard’s Empirical Analysis

1875

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
18
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2003 · most notably Burnet v. Willingham Loan & Trust Co. (1931), Taylor v. Brown (1893)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 46 state decisions — followed in 18 states

12018751880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sheets v. Selden's Lessee · Owen v. Slatter · Dexter v. Shepard · Weeks v. Hull · Columbia Turnpike Road v. Haywood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is contended that this statute did not take effect until the 2d day of July, nor, indeed, until it was formally promulgated and published. We cannot yield assent to this construction. The statute was to take effect from its passage; and it is a general rule that, where the computation is to be made from an act done, the day on which the act is done is to be included.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““It was indeed' decided in Presbrey v. Williams, 15 Mass. 193 , and assumed, though not necessary to the decision, in Little v. Blunt, 9 Pick. 488 , 491, that, in computing the period of limitation of actions, the. day on which the cause of action accrued should be included, because the action might have been brought on that day. But ”the decision was rested on the authority of Norris v. Gawtry, Hob. 139; S. C. Mo. 878; 1 Brownl. 156; and can hardly stand with the later adjudications.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The dictum... in [Perry], that “where time is computed from an act done, the general rule is to include the day,” was aside from the decision of the court... and it is supported by none of the authorities cited ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.