Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 MDAPP 142 - State v. Wheeler

State v. Wheeler’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kaczorowski v. Mayor of Baltimore · Harris v. State · Armstead v. State · Dickerson v. State · State v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Based on the plain language of section 286(f) and a comparison to section 286(c)(3) ... we hold that the trial court does not have discretion to sentence a defendant, who violated section 286(f), to drug treatment prior to the serving of the mandatory portion of the sentence."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]n order to commit a defendant to drug treatment pursuant to the Health General Article prior to the imposition of the mandatory sentence under § 286(c), a statutory provision must give the trial court discretion to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “sufficient quantity to reasonably indicate under all circumstances an intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.