¶1This is a proceeding to have determined the value of the legal services rendered by Howard Taylor, deceased, of the law firm of Taylor, Jackson, Brophy & Nash. Matter of Rabell, 175 App. Div. 345; Matter of Fullam, 111 Misc. Rep. 514. Mr. Taylor was retained by Robert B. Van Cortlandt in his lifetime to defend him in the suit brought in the Supreme Court, *540New York county, by Bourke-Schiff & Co. against Van Cortlandt and others. The action was brought to set aside and rescind a certain purchase syndicate agreement and to recover the sum of $2,848,487.32, losses alleged to have been sustained through misrepresentation and fraud largely on the part of Robert B. Van Cortlandt. In fact, the charges of fraud and misrepresentation were made only against Robert B. Van Cortlandt on the trial.
¶2Robert B. Van Cortlandt died February 8, 1918, leaving a last will and testament admitted to probate in the county of Westchester. An account of the temporary administrators shows that the gross estate was $971,000, and the net estate, after the sale of certain securities pledged to pay indebtedness, according to the accounting proceeding now pending, is about $740,000. If the decision had been adverse to Mr. Van Cortlandt, it would have wiped out his entire estate. The action was commenced on August 2, 1915, and judgment was entered therein March 12, 1920. The trial commenced on October 6, 1919, and ended November 1, 1919. The stenographer’s minutes consisted of 2,019 pages.
¶3This matter is submitted upon the. petition, affidavits in support thereof and an answering affidavit. The claim for legal services rendered by Mr. Taylor is $40,000, of which $15,000 has been paid on account by the executors of Mr. Van Cortlandt. The executors offer to pay up to $25,000 in full for legal services rendered by Mr. Taylor.
¶4A careful study of the papers submitted shows that there was some talk between Mr. Taylor and Mr. Van Cortlandt as to his fee. After Mr. Van Cortlandt’s death, Mr. Taylor stated he had an understanding that his fee should be $10,000, “ unless there is some protracted trial, submission of briefs, etc.” There is nothing in writing, however, relating to an agreement between Mr. Taylor and Mr. Van Cortlandt. After Mr. Van Cortlandt’s death, the matter of the fee was discussed, and letters were exchanged between the executors and Mr. Taylor. The willingness of the executors to pay up to $25,000 indicates their belief that there was some protracted trial, a trial out of the ordinary. For the legal services beyond the first one or two days of a trial, it would appear to me that there was no understanding as to the amount to be paid, leaving the payment for such services to be settled upon the quantum meruit basis.
¶5All the elements justifying a large fee for legal services are present in this case. Howard Taylor was a leading member of the bar, of wide experience, competency and skill. The estate of which Mr. Van Cortlandt disposed to Columbia University by his-last will and testament was a large one as indicated in this opinion. *541The circumstances were such that the trial of the case was critical and the outcome extremely uncertain. If the plaintiffs had won, there would have been no estate passing to Columbia University. The result of the trial may be regarded as a successful termination in favor of the estate. Able lawyers have given their opinions of the value of the services. I have reached the conclusion that the fair and reasonable value of the services, talcing into consideration the elements set forth, is $35,000. Of this amount, $15,000 has already been paid by the executors. Randall v. Packard, 142 N. Y. 47; Matter of Ketcham (Brasher Estate), 199 App. Div. 244.
¶6■ An order may be entered directing payment of $20,000 in full settlement of the claim for legal services rendered by Howard Taylor, deceased.
¶7Decreed accordingly.