Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 MO 153 - State v. Taylor

State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1893

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
9
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 69 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Wallace v. State (1899), Nickels v. State (1925)

6 federal appellate · 69 state decisions

25018931900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vicksburg v. O'Brien · Gilmer v. Higley · State v. Brooks · Smiths v. Shoemaker · Dayharsh v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We are aware that some courts have required the defendant to establish his alibi by a preponderance of the evidence; but, in our opinion, such a rule is contrary to the presumption of innocence, to which every defendant is entitled in a criminal prosecution, and to the rule that requires the state to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The burden is on the state and must remain on it throughout the trial . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.