Crossland v. Admire’s Empirical Analysis
1893
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently October 1996 · most notably Bussiere's Admisnistrator v. Sayman (1914), Crossland v. Admire (1899)
2 federal appellate · 54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Nichols v. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The amendment of section 2246 (Laws 1891, p. 70) allows an appeal from ‘any order granting a new trial.’ As plaintiff bases his right of appeal solely upon this provision, and- as no new trial was granted, it follows that the appeal should be dismissed, which is accordingly ordered. All concur,! except BARCLAY, J., who is absent.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Farrell v. DeClue““ * * * We do not think an order setting aside a judgment rendered on default is included within the terms or intent of the statute. There had been no ‘trial,’ within the meaning of that term, and a trial must precede- a new trial.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Farrell v. DeClue“the inquiry is directed solely to the amount for which the judgment shall be given. No issue between the parties is tried.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.