Range Co. v. . Cozart

¶1This case is governed by the opinion in the above case againstCarver. But it does not appear that any claim for county tax is involved; and as the defendant was restrained and enjoined by the order below from collecting the State tax imposed by (343) section 28, chapter 116, Laws 1895, the order was erroneous and should not have been granted. There is error, and the judgment is

¶2Reversed. *210