Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

118 N.C. 989

24 S.E 711

Brittain v. . Payne

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1896

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1896-02-05

Civil actioN, begun before a justice of the peace, and beard on appeal before Robinson, Judge presiding, at the Eall Term, 1895, of the Superior Court of Cheeok.ee County. The complaint was as follows : “ 1.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1899

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1896-02-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Clark, J.:

¶1 Where property is tortiously taken and sold, the owner may waive the tort and maintain an action to recover the money realized from the sale by the defendant. Lumber Co. v. Brooks, 109 N. C., 698; Wall v. Williams, 91 N. C., 477. And this is clearly what the plaintiff did by his complaint in this case. Every intendment being in favor of jurisdiction, if the complaint could have been construed as being either for the tort or to recover the money received by the defendant, this being an action before the justice, the Court would construe it to be an action on the implied contract in favor of the jurisdiction. Lewis v. Railroad, 95 N. C., 179; Stokes v. Taylor, 104 N. C., 394; Fulps v. Mock, 108 N. C., 601.

¶2 Error.

/118/nc/989 · .json · Public domain