Miller v. McLaughlin’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mugler v. State of Kansas State of Kansas Tufts · Christ Nielsen v. State of Oregon · Nicoulin v. O'Brien · Charles Wedding v. Romanza Jerome Meyler · Fisher v. Board of Regents of the University
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“concurrent jurisdiction on . . . every ., . . river bordering on the said State of Iowa, so far as the said river [s] shall form a common boundary to said State, and any other State . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. McLaughlin“any fish except minnows from the waters within the state of Nebraska with nets, traps or seines,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. McLaughlin“except as authorized by the Department of Agriculture.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. McLaughlin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.