Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 Nev. 61 - Batin v. State

Batin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · State v. Trolson · United States v. Sayklay · State v. Doucet

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to be guilty of embezzlement, a defendant must have been entrusted with lawful possession of the property prior to its conversion____ [A] showing that a defendant was given mere access to the property converted is insufficient. Often, an individual is entrusted with access to a particular place or thing without being given dominion and control over the property therein. This is particularly true in instances, like the present one, where the individual is expressly told that he is not allowed to touch the property in the place to which access is granted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.