Marshall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2025
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Zafiro v. United States · United States v. Haldeman · Middleton v. State · United States v. Throckmorton · Lisle v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`if there is a serious risk• that [it] would compromise a specific trial right of one of the defendants, or prevent the jury from making a reliable judgment about guilt or innocence.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“conflicting and irreconcilable defenses and there is danger that the jury will unjustifiably infer that this conflict alone demonstrates that both are guilty”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“this joint trial undermined the jury's ability to render a reliable judgment as to [his] guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.